Constitutional law in a nutshell (Registro nro. 240780)
[ vista simple ]
| 000 -• Cabecera (Nr) | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02349nam a22002177a 4500 |
| 005 - • Fecha Y Hora De La Ultima Transaccion (Nr) | |
| control field | 20201112212514.0 |
| 008 - • Elementos de longitud fija (NR) | |
| fixed length control field | 120423t2009 ck ||||fr|||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 020 ## - • Número Internacional Normalizado para Libros (ISBN) (R) | |
| ISBN | 978-0-314-19028-4 |
| 041 ## - • Idiomas (NR) | |
| idioma | Spa |
| 082 ## - • Número de clasificación decimal de Dewey (R) | |
| Número de clasificación (R) | 342 B277 |
| 100 ## - • Nombre personal (NR) | |
| Personal name | Barron, Jerome A. |
| 245 ## - • Titulo propiamente dicho (NR) | |
| Title | Constitutional law in a nutshell |
| 300 ## - • Descripción física (R) | |
| Extent | 709 p. |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | This 9th edition of Constitutional Law in a Nutshell summarizes constitutional law from Marbury v. Madison (1803) to the present. This edition features some new and controversial cases. A new and famous example is Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) which held, per Justice Kennedy, 5-4, that under both the Due Process and the Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment “same sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry in all States.” In Fisher v University of Texas (2016) the Court held, 4-3, per Justice Kennedy, that the much litigated, race-conscious admissions program of the University of Texas was valid under the Equal Protection Clause. In the area of “a woman’s right to decide to have an abortion,” the Court in Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt (2016) upheld, 5-2, the use of rigorous undue burden standard as the measure of the abortion right. The Court ruled that two provisions of a Texas law targeting the state’s abortion clinics were unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment. The First Amendment, as always, continues to generate new and important decisions. Thus, Reed v. Gilbert (2015) held that a town sign ordinance violated the First Amendment. The court indicated that any speech regulation directed to a specific subject matter should be evaluated under the strict scrutiny standard. The decision leaves open a question as to whether this ruling is intended to be applied to previously less protected categories of expression. This edition, of course, contains numerous other important decisions. The objective is to summarize the essence of the Court decisions and to do so in a concise and understandable way.<br/><br/> |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | DERECHO - ESTADOS UNIDOS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | DERECHO POLÍTICO Y CONSTITUCIONAL |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL - ESTADOS UNIDOS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL COMPARADO |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | I.Dienes, C. Tomas |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type | Libro Colección General |
| Expurgo - (Retirado) | Estado de Perdido | Estado de Dañado | No prestable | Colección | Koha itemnumber | Ubicación habitual | Ubicación actual | Fecha de adquisición | Costo | Full call number | Código de barras | Ejemplar | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ó----- | Colección General | 435239 | Campus Armenia | Campus Armenia | 23/04/2012 | 170.00 | 342 B277 | L027604 | 1 | Libro Colección General |