The effect of mandatory audit firm rotation on client importance and audit industry concentration Christopher Bleibtreu & Ulrike Stefani
Tipo de material:
ArtículoDescripción: Páginas 1 a la 27Tema(s):
En: The accounting review 2018 V.93 No.1 (Ene)Incluye figuras, referencias bibliográficas y apéndicesResumen: Recently, a system of audit firm rotation has been implemented for the audits of listed companies conducted in the EU. In the US, in contrast, the regulator decided against such rotation. Whereas proponents argue that rotation would strengthen independence and decrease audit market concentration, opponents stress the importance of auditors’ learning effects, which would be eliminated by a change in auditors.
In extending the market matching model of Salop (1979), we provide an analysis that integrates these contradictory views. We assume that both auditors’ industry expertise and their experience in auditing a client decrease audit costs. We investigate the bidding strategies applied to re-acquire clients that were lost due to rotation, auditors’ profit contributions, the equilibrium number of auditors (i.e., audit market concentration), and the economic importance of specific clients.
Our findings indicate that the regulators’ goals of simultaneously decreasing client importance and audit market concentration are in direct conflict, and therefore the rotation system might have unintended consequences. Our model thus suggests how different institutional parameters give rise to economic forces that can support diverging decisions regarding the implementation of MAR.
| Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura topográfica | Info Vol | Copia número | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revistas | Central Bogotá Sala Hemeroteca | Colección Hemeroteca | 657 (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | 2018 V.93 No.1 (Ene) | 1 | Disponible | 0000002033448 |
Recently, a system of audit firm rotation has been implemented for the audits of listed companies conducted in the EU. In the US, in contrast, the regulator decided against such rotation. Whereas proponents argue that rotation would strengthen independence and decrease audit market concentration, opponents stress the importance of auditors’ learning effects, which would be eliminated by a change in auditors.
In extending the market matching model of Salop (1979), we provide an analysis that integrates these contradictory views. We assume that both auditors’ industry expertise and their experience in auditing a client decrease audit costs. We investigate the bidding strategies applied to re-acquire clients that were lost due to rotation, auditors’ profit contributions, the equilibrium number of auditors (i.e., audit market concentration), and the economic importance of specific clients.
Our findings indicate that the regulators’ goals of simultaneously decreasing client importance and audit market concentration are in direct conflict, and therefore the rotation system might have unintended consequences. Our model thus suggests how different institutional parameters give rise to economic forces that can support diverging decisions regarding the implementation of MAR.